Toll Free
877.485.1973 | T: 541.485.1973 | F: 541.683.7543
 | P.O. Box 11248 | Eugene, OR 97440
Facebook footer  Tiwtter footer  LinkedIn footer  YouTube footer  Vimeo footer  Pinterest footer

We're currently experiencing issues with Research Areas not being categorized correctly. We're working on a solution and apologize for the inconvenience.

If you have difficulty locating publications you are looking for please see Tips for Using the Database.

The singer or the song

Branwhite, A.
Abstract:
This study examined the effectiveness of DISTAR Reading on the reading achievement of 14 elementary remedial students (12 boys, 2 girls) in the United Kingdom. The students were divided into two groups with each group receiving instruction with DISTAR Reading at separate phases. Group 1 received instruction with DISTAR Reading during both phases. Group 2 received instruction with an alternative remedial program during phase one and DISTAR Reading during phase two. Schonell’s graded word reading test was administered for pre- and posttest measures. Results from phase one indicate that students in the DISTAR only group recorded significantly greater scores than students in the Remedial/DISTAR group. Both interventions exceeded predicted growth of 12 months gain during 12 months of instruction. Results from phase 2 indicate that DISTAR only students’ growth decreased by 2.63 months per 12 months from their rate of progress in phase one. Students in the Remedial/DISTAR group nearly doubled their progress during phase two. On average, students in the Remedial/DISTAR group read 30.5 correct words per minute with three errors per minute while students in the DISTAR only group read 67.5 correct words per minute with four errors per minute. (Copyright © 2011, National Institute for Direct Instruction (NIFDI). All rights reserved).
Research areas:
Year:
1982
Main publication type:
Program Effectiveness
Subtype:
Article
Keywords:
DISTAR Reading; remedial students; Schonell'; s graded word reading test
Source:
DI News
Volume:
1
Number:
2
Pages:
6-7
Design type:
Pretest posttest control group design with matched comparisons
Fidelity monitored:
No
Students included:
Elementary students, low-SES students, remedial students, at-risk students, students with learning disabilities
Location/Setting:
United Kingdom, Britain, elementary school, urban area

Research Article Request Button newsite3

Upcoming Events

There are no up-coming events

Module-Bottom-Button-A rev

Module-Bottom-Button-B rev

Module-Bottom-Button-C rev2

AmazonSmileModule 01