877.485.1973 ⎸ 541.485.1973
Info@NIFDI.org

Project Follow Through

Project Follow Through

What Was Project Follow Through?

Project Follow Through was a federally sponsored education study launched in 1968 to identify the most effective ways to teach at-risk children in kindergarten through grade 3. It involved more than 200,000 students across 178 communities, representing diverse geographic regions, racial and ethnic groups, and income levels. Families in each community selected the instructional model their schools would implement.

The goal was to determine which instructional approaches produced the strongest outcomes for students facing the greatest educational challenges. With strong federal funding, implementation support, and accountability measures, Follow Through was designed to be a rigorous, real-world test of competing educational models.

What Were the Results?

After nine years, the evaluation results were clear: Direct Instruction (DI) outperformed all other models. Students in DI programs showed significantly higher academic achievement, stronger self-confidence, and better long-term outcomes, including higher rates of high school completion and postsecondary participation. No other model produced comparable or replicable results.

The Findings Were Never Shared

Despite the strength and consistency of the findings, the U.S. Office of Education chose not to disseminate the results. Although policymakers accepted the data as valid, the outcomes challenged prevailing educational beliefs. Rather than promoting the one model that consistently succeeded, all models were treated equally, and the most effective approach was not broadly shared with states and districts.

Project Follow Through remains the largest and most consequential educational experiment in U.S. history, and its findings continue to inform NIFDI’s work to promote evidence-based, replicable instructional practices.

Here is a letter from the U.S Commissioner at the time (equivalent to today’s Secretary of Education) explaining why the results of the evaluation were not disseminated:

Siegfried Engelmann, Senior Author of the DI programs, provides a full description of the Follow Through experiment, the results, and the aftermath in his book, Teaching Needy Kids in our Backward System (ADI Press, 2007). Engelmann examines the Commissioner’s rationale for not disseminating the evaluation results in Chapter 5 (from pp. 250-51).

Additional Information

Athabasca University online module on Direct Instruction Evidence: Project Follow Through.

A special issue of Effective School Practices published in 1995-96 described Project Follow Through and its implications for current generations of students.

Shepard Barbash describes the design and outcomes of Project Follow Through in his book Clear Teaching.

A comprehensive bibliography of writing related to Direct Instruction and Project Follow Through.

Sponsor Findings from Project Follow Through

Project Follow Through Playlist

4 Videos
About This Video

Project Follow Through and Its Relevance Today

In 1967, the United States Department of Education launched the largest and most ambitious educational experiment in history: Project Follow Through. Its stated purpose was to discover which approach was best for teaching at-risk children from kindergarten through grade 3.

Veteran Direct Instruction author, researcher, and implementer Bonnie Grossen presented this webinar and provided insight into the outcomes of the project and the response to the findings.

Topics covered include:

  • Goals and Origins of Project Follow Through
  • Scope and Structure
  • Results and Implications
  • Critique and Lack of Dissemination
  • Significance Today

Download participant materials here.

Original broadcast April 21, 2021

Interested in learning how to implement Direct Instruction in your district, school, or home? NIFDI can help. Click a button below to learn more. 

What is a Peer Coach?

Peer coaches play a critical role in sustaining strong implementation of Direct Instruction (DI) at the school level. Selected during the first year of implementation, peer coaches are classroom teachers who demonstrate strong instructional practice, effective communication with colleagues, and a willingness to support others. Because they teach the same programs as their peers, they bring practical expertise and shared experience that help build trust and collaboration across the school.

As implementation progresses, peer coaches extend the impact of NIFDI consultants by providing ongoing, school-based support when consultants are not on-site. Their coaching is non-evaluative and focused on improving student outcomes. Peer coaches reinforce effective teaching practices and guide colleagues to make targeted adjustments that directly impact student performance and behavior.

Peer coaches participate in a structured, multi-year training sequence through NIFDI. Over the course of two to three years, they are trained to analyze student performance data, conduct both brief and extended classroom observations, and support data-driven problem solving. Advanced training prepares them to lead grade-level meetings and contribute to broader instructional planning with school leadership.

By developing peer coaches, schools build internal capacity to maintain and strengthen DI implementation over time—ensuring continuity, supporting new staff, and driving sustained student achievement.