Proper training is a crucial part of implementing DI with fidelity. Schools that work with NIFDI receive an extensive amount of training as part of their implementation package. All implementations include assessment training, pre-service training, and in-service training. The amount of time needed to train teachers and administrators will vary depending on the scope of the implementation and the size of the school or district.
Placement Test Training
Providing placement test training to staff and conducting placement testing of students in the Direct Instruction (DI) programs are important first steps in implementing any model of DI. The individual assessment results allow students to be placed and grouped in specific DI programs. Placing and grouping students in late spring allows DI instruction to start on the first day of school. Read More
Preservice Training
A common misconception is that Direct Instruction programs are easy to teach because they are composed of scripted lessons. Nothing could be further from the truth. Mastering the instructional skills needed to teach the DI programs is difficult. Preservice is the start of the learning process for teachers, teaching assistants, and administrators to master these skills. Read More
In-Service Training
Throughout the year, the National Institute for Direct Instruction provides staff development through in-service training sessions for schools implementing DI. These in-service sessions pick up where the preservice training leaves off by preparing participants to teach formats that appear later in the program and expanding on techniques covered during preservice. Read More
Decades of research document that children learn more when their instruction is systematic, explicit, and efficient. Effective instruction is accelerated instruction, with students learning more within a shorter period of time. Siegfried Engelmann and Wesley Becker, the founders of Direct Instruction, pioneered the research in explicit instructional techniques. All of the Direct Instruction curricula are based on the elements that they and their followers derived through years of careful research.
Even though many curricula include elements of effective instructional programs, this does not mean that they are necessarily effective. Specialists in the field distinguish Direct Instruction (capitalized), the programs developed by Engelmann and his colleagues, from direct instruction (no capitals), curricula that incorporate only some of the effective elements.
Click on the links below to learn more about how Direct Instruction is effective instruction and how it differs from other programs:
The Research Base for Reading Mastery, SRA by Bonnie Grossen, Ph.D. (http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~adiep/rdgtxt.htm)
A Rubric for Identifying Authentic Direct Instruction Programs, by Siegfried Engelmann, the founder of Direct Instruction, and Geoff Colvin, Ph.D. (www.zigsite.com/PDFs/rubric.pdf)
Student-Program Alignment and Teaching to Mastery, by Siegfried Engelmann (www.zigsite.com/PDFs/StuPro_Align.pdf)
Siegfried “Zig” Engelmann’s personal website provides much information on the theory and research behind DI. (www.zigsite.com)
An article by Cheryl Schieffer and colleagues, published in 2002, analyses DI’s Reading Mastery program and shows how it embodies the elements of effective instruction. [Schieffer et al, JODI, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 87-119]
DI Programs are based on years of research on how children learn and the most effective ways to teach. This work produced the basic principles of effective instruction: All children can learn when instruction is systematic, explicit, and efficient. Poor achievement does not result from poor students, but from poor teaching. Direct Instruction programs, developed by Siegfried Engelmann and colleagues, incorporate all of these elements of effective instruction.
Many studies have evaluated Direct Instruction programs and documented their effectiveness. NIFDI's searchable database includes summaries of dozens of peer reviewed, scientifically strong studies of DI programs. See The DI Research Base and Search for Articles on DI.
All Direct Instruction programs are extensively field tested during development. Students and teachers throughout the country try out each program, and their feedback is used to make sure they are highly effective. See Field Testing DI Programs.
NEW! A Bibliography of the DI Curriculum and Studies Examining its Efficacy
Researchers continue to study Direct Instruction, and the literature on DI continues to grow. Check out the latest addition to NIFDI's tools and resources on DI research: A Bibliography of the DI Curriculum and Studies Examining its Efficacy.