As a non-profit organization founded by the creator of Direct Instruction, the National Institute for Direct Instruction pursues opportunities to conduct high quality research on the effects of Direct Instruction on a wide range of students in different settings. Additional information regarding participation in a research study is outlined below. NIFDI is interested in partnering with sites that can help us demonstrate the positive effect of the full immersion (comprehensive) model of Direct Instruction on student achievement. We have found that the maximum benefit of the model for students takes place at the earliest grade levels. We are generally most interested in beginning the implementation of DI in early childhood programs or at primary grade levels then expanding the implementation by a grade each year into the intermediate grades. This way, students' performance is accelerated as they progress through the grades. It also allows NIFDI to meet our goal of demonstrating the effect of the DI approach, as cohorts coming up from the primary grades will perform at a much higher level than current students.
What opportunities are available?
Current opportunities include:
What are the benefits of participating?
NIFDI will:
What will be expected of participating schools?
Participating schools will implement Direct Instruction curricula fully with select students. This will involve:
What are the steps for setting up a research site?
NIFDI is a small, non-profit organization that supports implementations of DI in about 60 schools across the country (plus 3 schools in Australia). As a small organization, we cannot afford to fund many research projects. We must fund only those projects with the highest prospects for success. Below is a summary of the process of establishing a research project to ensure success and how this process applies to schools.
STEP 1
Step one in establishing a research project involves jointly determining the focus of the project (grade ranges, subject areas, duration, student and teacher involvement) and the key parameters of the research project (the research design, measures used, form of assignment, etc.).
STEP 2
The second step in establishing a research project is to review the DI model for the grade levels and subject areas agreed to by both parties. The implementation of DI is successful only when certain requirements are met, and these requirements vary slightly by grade level, subject area and the performance level of the students. There are a number of elements required for a successful implementation. These requirements are outlined in the Essential Elements handout.
STEP 3
The third step in establishing a research project is to develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that serves as a guiding document for the research project. The MOU lists the requirements of the school or district for implementing the DI model and providing access to students and data. It also lists the benefits that the school and district will receive, including free training and coaching by NIFDI, free materials for the focus areas of the research project, and small stipends for teachers who participate in surveys. The MOU includes a confidentiality commitment by NIFDI that no individual students will be identified in any publications resulting from the study. Below is a sample MOU. The agreement is customized to reflect the joint agreement NIFDI and the school or district develop together.
The above steps are the most important ones involving the school/district directly. The remaining steps in the research process are internal to NIFDI and don't involve directly involve the school or district: conducting the research and publishing the results.
I think this might be appropriate for my school. What should I do now?
If this opportunity sounds like a potential fit for your school or district, please complete and submit the Check-Off Form for Implementing the Full Immersion Direct Instruction Model. You can fax your completed form to Kurt Engelmann at 541.683.7543.
The National Institute for Direct Instruction (NIFDI) has an Institutional Review Board charged with reviewing research procedures to assess any possible risks to research subjects and to ensure that the procedures provide appropriate protections for these subjects.
This document discusses serious concerns with the policies, procedures and judgments of the federally funded What Works Clearinghouse, focusing both on a recent Clearinghouse review of the Direct Instruction program Reading Mastery as well as more general issues regarding their procedures and conclusions.
This paper reports the results of a study that employed a pretest-posttest control group design to examine the relationship of instruction in Funnix Beginning Reading to the development of beginning reading skills.